Drawing for LITTLE CHEF

USPTO serial 76426954

LITTLE CHEF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITTLE CHEF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela M. Fifelski

ANGELA M FIFELSKI ICE MILLERONE AMERICAN SQ BOX 82001INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46282-0002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029processed vegetables, soup, and soup mixesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 11, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 2, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 2, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 23, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 16, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance