USPTO serial 76426954
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angela M. Fifelski
ANGELA M FIFELSKI ICE MILLERONE AMERICAN SQ BOX 82001INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46282-0002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed vegetables, soup, and soup mixes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 10, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |