Drawing for STRIP-LITE

USPTO serial 76427207

STRIP-LITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STRIP-LITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Guy D. Yale

GUY D. YALE ALIX, YALE & RISTAS, LLP750 MAIN STHARTFORD, CT 06103-2703UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Emergency warning lights; emergency warning lights for vehicles; flashing safety lightsACTIVEMay 8, 2002
011Interior lights for steps for vehicles, and vehicle compartments; vehicle-mounted lighting assemblies, which principally employ light emitting diodes, used for indicating and identifying the location of objects and structuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 6, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance