Drawing for PKI ONE

USPTO serial 76427386

PKI ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PKI ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin J. Ryan

KEVIN J RYAN BURKE, WARREN, MACKAY & SERRITELLA330 N WABASH AVE22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60611

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Communications servers, namely, a server appliance that delivers Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) services in a streamlined product, combining optimized hardware and customized software in one package and consisting of computer network hubs, switches, routers, and communications software for connecting computer network users and global computer networks, all sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 2, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 8, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance