Drawing for ISOCHECK

USPTO serial 76427541

ISOCHECK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISOCHECK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George R. Schultz

GEORGE R SCHULTZ SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES PC5400 LBJ FREEWAY STE 1200DALLAS, TX 75240UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemicals used as trace additives to indicate ownership or origin of tagged fluids, namely chemical markers and tagging agents for use in counterfeit detection and product identificationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 17, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 31, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 14, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance