Drawing for ESP E-SCREENER PLUS

USPTO serial 76427613

ESP E-SCREENER PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESP E-SCREENER PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis N. Lee, III

LOUIS N LEE III LOOPER REED & MCGRAW PC4100 THANKSGIVING TWR1601 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Installation and maintenance of computer software and technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of the computer software related to a web-based newborn screening information management system utilized to record, manage and report on newborn screening resultsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 27, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance