Drawing for CROSSWORKER

USPTO serial 76428009

CROSSWORKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROSSWORKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher A. Sloan, Esq.

CHRISTOPHER A SLOAN ESQ BOULT, CUMMINGS, CONNERS & BERRY, PLC414 UNION ST STE 1600NASHVILLE, TN 37219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective ergonomic and safety footwear, namely industrial, public safety, hospitality, and nursing shoes and bootsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 23, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance