Drawing for BEYOND JUICE

USPTO serial 76428192

BEYOND JUICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEYOND JUICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ned Ardagna

NED ARDAGNA HASKINS & ASSOCIATES4045 BONITA RD STE 206BONITA, CA 91902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional Supplements, namely concentrated fruit and vegetable extracts in powder formACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 6, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 6, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 22, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 21, 2004GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 25, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 15, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 10, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 19, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance