USPTO serial 76428295
FENX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FENX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BILKO ILAC KOZMETIK VE KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Kucukcekmece-ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by BILKO ILAC KOZMETIK VE KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
BILKO ILAC KOZMETIK VE KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Kucukcekmece-ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by BILKO ILAC KOZMETIK VE KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Glass cleaners, perfumes, colognes, skin lotions, hand lotions, body lotions, face lotions, skin creams, face creams, hand creams, body creams, skin protecting creams, body powders, face powders, deodorants, shaving colognes, shaving soaps, shaving creams, cosmetics, nail polishes, rouges, cosmetic for eyelashes, eyeliners, lip lingers, mascara, eye shadows, pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes, shampoos, hair care preparations, hair paints, hair creams, hair gels, hair foam, hair spray, shower gels, shower shampoos, shower foam, body oil, body cleaners, bath foam, liquid face soaps and liquid hand soaps, and cotton, cotton balls, cotton puffs and cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BILKO ILAC KOZMETIK VE KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by BILKO ILAC KOZMETIK VE KIMYA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named FENX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |