USPTO serial 76428381
PLANE WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLANE WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott L. Harper, Esq.
David W. Carstens Carstens & Cahoon, LLPP. O. Box 802334Dallas, TX 75380UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing,namely, shirts, t-shirts, shirts, t-shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, tank tops, jerseys, jackets, shorts, pants, shoes, sandals, and headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |