USPTO serial 76428904
QMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Morrisburg, Ontario KOC 1X0, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Haarz
DAVID R HAARZ DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1901 L ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036-3510UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Baby powder, shower powder, non-medicated foot powder, baking soda powder cleaners for topical application on the skin, laundry soap, dishwasher soap, septic tank cleaning powder | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | hand tools, namely household and automobile snowscrapers; and lawn care product, namely, shovels | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | kitchen measuring cups | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | plastic storage bins | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | household utensils, namely, spatulas, pots, garbage cans; lawn care products, namely scoops; kitchen cups made of plastic and drinking glasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quality Manufacturing Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named QMI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |