USPTO serial 76428978
LONG HARD RIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LONG HARD RIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
NATIONAL CITY, CA
NATIONAL CITY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. DAY
CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER J DAY340 E PALM LN STE 282PHOENIX, AZ 85004-4581UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | PANTS, SHIRTS, JACKETS, SHOES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jacobs, Adam Reid
- Other trademarks owned by Hill, Stephen Don, Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by LHR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LHR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LONG HARD RIDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |