Drawing for BIG IDEA PICTURES

USPTO serial 76429216

BIG IDEA PICTURES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG IDEA PICTURES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Malcolm McCaleb, Jr.

MS SONJA KEITH CLASSIC MEDIA860 BROADWAY 6TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Motion picture film production and distribution servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 17, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 7, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance