Drawing for AFFILENE

USPTO serial 76429232

AFFILENE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AFFILENE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH J. ORLANDO

JOSEPH J ORLANDO BUCKNAM AND ARCHER1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1696UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Medicinal plant extracts for use in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 26, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance