USPTO serial 76429289
STRATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Constance M. Jordan
STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP1201 WALNUT ST SUTIE 2800KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | A FLEXIBLE MIDDLE LAYER BETWEEN A LAYER OF EXISTING PAVEMENT SURFACE AND A LAYER OF NEW RIDING SURFACE TO RETARD REFLECTIVE CRACKING | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1998 |
| 037 | PAVING ROADS, INCLUDING SELECTING ROAD CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, ROAD CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION, OVERSEEING THE ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROCESS, ROAD PAVING CONSTRUCTION, PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF ASSESSING PAVEMENT CONDITIONS, PROVIDING ROAD PAVEMENT PLANNING, TECHNICAL RESEARCH, AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR ASSESSING PAVEMENT CONDITIONS, DESIGN OF MATERIALS | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |