USPTO serial 76429391
VIGILANCE VESSEL PROFILING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2005
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIGILANCE VESSEL PROFILING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Maritime Intelligence Group, Inc.
Washington, DC
Maritime Intelligence Group, Inc.
Washington, DC
Maritime Intelligence Group, Inc.
Washington, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CYNTHIA C. WEBER
CYNTHIA C WEBER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Professional services giving direct aid in the operations or functions of a commercial or governmental undertaking, namely consultation and evaluations related to security screening and terrorism risk profiling of vessels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maritime Intelligence Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Maritime Intelligence Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Maritime Intelligence Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named VIGILANCE VESSEL PROFILING SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 31, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |