USPTO serial 76429474
SANKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E. BAXLEY, Esq.
CHARLES E BAXLEY ESQ HART BAXLEY DANIELS59 JOHN ST FL 5NEW YORK, NY 10038-3709UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | faucets, manually-operated plumbing valves, plumbing fittings namely, bibbs, cocks, traps, valves, plumbing fittings namely, aerators for faucets, plumbing fittings namely, couplers, plumbing fittings namely, drains, plumbing fittings namely, faucet filters, plumbing fittings namely, shower control valves, plumbing fittings namely, spouts, plumbing fittings namely, tub control valves, plumbing fittings namely, sink traps, mixer faucets for water pipes, pipes being parts of sanitary facilities | ACTIVE | Jan 8, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |