USPTO serial 76429523
FRESH BITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESH BITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JESSE E BUSCH
JESSE E BUSCH KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP535 SMITHFIELD ST STE 1500HENRY W OLIVER BLDGPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2312Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [Based on Intent to Use] Salads made with various ingredients, namely, fruit, garden and vegetable salads | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (BASED ON USE) Bakery products; Bakery goods; Bakery desserts, namely, sweet breads, croissants, danishes, tarts, muffins, pastries, strudels, pies, cakes, and doughnuts; Specially prepared sandwiches made with various ingredients, namely, bread, ham, pepperoni, bologna, roast beef, turkey, pastrami, salami, crab, shrimp, tuna, sausage, meatballs and cheese (BASED ON INTENT TO USE) Salads made with various ingredients, namely, macaroni, pasta and rice; and frozen and partially baked bakery products | ACTIVE | Oct 3, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ono International LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ono International LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FRESH BITE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |