Drawing for ICD

USPTO serial 76429567

ICD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HARVEY B. JACOBSON, JR.

HARVEY B JACOBSON JR JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600THE JENIFER BLDGWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007motor vehicles parts for engines, namely, crank shafts, crank shaft dampers, pilot bearings, clutch thrust bearings, release bearings, dual mass flywheel, vibration absorbers, V-belt pulleys, V-belt pulley dampers accessory drive isolators, inertia flywheel clutches, vibration isolators, and hydraulic jacksACTIVE—
012motor vehicle parts, namely, power transmissions, automatic and semiautomatic transmissions, continuously variable transmissions, shift mechanisms and control systems therefor, torque convertors, hybrid drive gears, hydraulic valves for brake systems, hydraulic compensation units for brake systems, clutch covers, clutch disks, clutch friction facings, clutch pressure plates, clutch actuators, centrifugal clutches, drive shafts, hydrostatic and hydrodynamic torque converters, torque converter clutches, clutch discs, clutch diaphragm springs, brake bands, and motorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 18, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 17, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 12, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance