USPTO serial 76429693
BIO-ALLOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIO-ALLOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Verdun, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Remenick
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic biosensors; electronic diagnostic biosensors that sense photoluminescence for the detection, identification and quantification of biological and chemical agents, harmful contaminants, and infectious materials, in the fields of medical research, genomics, proteomics, drug development, molecular and cell biology, biotechnology, defense-related industries, environmental research, food and water quality, industrial applications, and chemical and biological agent monitoring, surveillance and screening; biosensing and diagnostic smart materials, namely, biosensing and diagnostic semiconductors and semiconductor compositions; electronic biosensing modules, biosensing chips, biosensing fiber optic waveguides, biosensing capillary columns; biomodified, photoluminescent, and nanostructural semiconductor materials, namely, biomodified, photoluminescent, and nanostructured semiconductors and semiconductor compositions; detection and surveillance devices, namely, biosensors and bio-arrays; chemical and biological agent detection, identification, quantification, and reporting systems comprising readers and biosensing cartridges or bio-arrays; scientific apparatus, namely, biosensors, biosensing modules, diagnostic elements, namely, cartridges, and biosensor reporting systems comprising readers and biosensing cartridges or bio-arrays for use in the detection, identification and quantification of biological and chemical agents, harmful contaminants, and infectious materials in the fields of medical research, genomics, proteomics, defense-related industries, environmental research, and chemical and biological agent monitoring, surveillance and screening | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Diagnostic and screening devices, namely, biosensors; medical and surgical apparatus, namely, in vivo or in vitro biosensors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |