Drawing for ENDURANCE

USPTO serial 76429782

ENDURANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENDURANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Lucas

JAMES A LUCAS DRIGGS, LUCAS, BRUBAKER & HOGG CO LP38500 CHARDON RDWILLOUGHBY HILLS, OH 44094UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031LIVING PLANTS AND PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY DOGWOOD TREES AND SHRUBS AND SCIONS, BUDS, STEM CUTTINGS AND ROOT CUTTINGS THEREFROMACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 31, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance