Drawing for EDY

USPTO serial 76430033

EDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. G. Horowitz

Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009blank or pre-recorded integrated circuit cards containing integrated chips to be used as ID cards, credit cards, cash cards, debit cards, and traffic tickets; contactless readers and writers for electronic data signals from integrated circuit cards containing integrated chipsACTIVE—
036financial information provided by electronic means; electronic funds transfer; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; financial clearing houses; banking; bill payment services; funds investments; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data using integrated circuit cards containing integrated chips and batteries as a mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 14, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 1, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance