Drawing for DRUMMOND GROUP INC.

USPTO serial 76430343

DRUMMOND GROUP INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRUMMOND GROUP INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert C. Klinger

Robert C. Klinger Law Office of Robert C. Klinger2591 Dallas ParkwaySuite 300Frisco, TX 75034

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software consulting, specifically, vendor neutral collaborative interoperability software consulting and market validation for software companies, vertical industry groups and standards communities driving the adoption of B2B supply chain technologies through interoperability testing, linking horizontal messaging and business processing standards across supply chains in vertical industries including retail, healthcare, grocery, transportation, government and automotiveACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 4, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance