USPTO serial 76430417
QUIK D-SOLVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUIK D-SOLVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles J. Raubicheck, Esq.
CHARLES J RAUBICHECK ESQ FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMICALS, NAMELY, POLYMERIZED RAW MATERIALS AND RELATED TECHNOLOGIES USED IN FORMULATING AND MANUFACTURING TABLET DOSAGE FORMS, ALLOWING SUCH TABLETS TO DISSOLVE RAPIDLY ON THE TONGUE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |