USPTO serial 76430604
RAYLOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAYLOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
B - 1070 BRUSSELS, BE
B - 1070 Bruxelles, BE
B - 1070 Bruxelles, BE
CYTEC SURFACE SPECIALTIES S.A.
B-1070 BRUSSELS, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaushal R. Odedra, Esq.
KAUSHAL R ODEDRA ESQ WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Artificial and synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of coatings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SURFACE SPECIALTIES, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by UCB, Societe Anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by UCB, Societe Anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by CYTEC SURFACE SPECIALTIES S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named RAYLOK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |