Drawing for FUELING INNOVATION

USPTO serial 76430849

FUELING INNOVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3155473Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with FUELING INNOVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA SNYDER FAIGMAN

LISA SNYDER FAIGMAN LAW OFFICE OF LISA S FAIGMAN20 ST JUDE RDMILL VALLEY, CA 94941UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting services in the areas of process improvement, namely, recovery audits, operational supply chain analysis, modeling and design, financial analysis, and process assessment and/or redesign; personnel management; business research and organization; and discovery auditsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 5, 2002
042Product development consultationSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 5, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 3, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 19, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 15, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 3, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 26, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 22, 2004REINREINSTATED
Jun 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance