Drawing for A. B. CHASE

USPTO serial 76431078

A. B. CHASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A. B. CHASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lucian Wayne Beavers

LUCIAN WAYNE BEAVERS WADDEY & PATTERSON PC1600 DIVISION ST STE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015pianosACTIVESep 1, 1875

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 17, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 26, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 26, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 13, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 13, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 13, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance