Drawing for BUSTED

USPTO serial 76431989

BUSTED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3055842Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 31, 2006
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUSTED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric S. Hyman

Rashman, Richard8600 Wilbur AvenueNorthridge, CA 91324UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016posters and books featuring a musical groupSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—
025clothing; namely t-shirts, jackets, hats, tops and bottomsSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2007C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 10, 2007CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2007CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 2007PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 31, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 16, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 13, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 16, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance