USPTO serial 76432411
PROMEDIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2885645Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROMEDIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WINDSOR, ONTARIO, CA
WINDSOR, ONTARIO, CA
WINDSOR, ONTARIO, CA
Vanier, Quebec G1M 2T2, CA
NEWCASTLE, ONTARIO, CA
NEWCASTLE, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth D. Suzan
Kenneth D. Suzan Hodgson Russ LLPThe Guaranty Building140 Pearl Street, Suite 100Buffalo, NY 14202-4040Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Foods for dietetic use, namely, [ meal replacement and ] dietary [ supplement drink mixes ] and food bars, all enriched with proteins, vitamins and minerals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 19, 1999 |
| 029 | Foods for dietetic use namely, consomme soup [ and omelets ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 19, 2002 |
| 030 | [ Food for dietetic use, namely, puddings, hot chocolate, custard tarts and salad dressings ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 19, 2002 |
| 032 | [ Foods for dietetic use, namely, fruit juice base, vegetable juice base, tomato juice base, and fruit juice concentrates ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 19, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JAMIESON LABORATORIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by JAMIESON LABORATORIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by JAMIESON LABORATORIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVITECH SOLUTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PROMEDIS GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PROMEDIS GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PROMEDIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |