Drawing for CONTENTSCAN

USPTO serial 76432809

CONTENTSCAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTENTSCAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ

SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON HOLMAN, PLLC400 SEVENTH STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for information retrieval and delivery in the scientific, educational, teaching and research fields; electronic publications, namely, books and journal articles featuring scientific, educational, teaching, and research articles and topics, recorded on CD roms and computer softwareACTIVE—
041Electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on CD roms, on computer software, and on-line, featuring scientific, educational, teaching, and research articles and topics; on-line publication of lexicons; on-line publication of professional biographical profiles of individuals and institutionsACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining information on publications on a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 23, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 23, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2006ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 17, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 16, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 16, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 24, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 22, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance