USPTO serial 76432947
ORION-1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORION-1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Mangelson, Esq.
MICHAEL E MANGELSON ESQ STOEL RIVES LLPONE UTAH CTR201 S MAIN ST STE 1100SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | electrosurgical instruments for use in separating, severing, cutting, coagulating, vaporizing and devitalizing tissues for medical and surgical purposes, namely-- high frequency control cabinets, including temperature controlling circuits, high frequency current overload detectors, high frequency voltage overload detectors, and high frequency output controllers, footswitches, power cables, grounding cables, extension cables, and electrodes, for use in the medical fields of neurosurgery, gynecology, orthopedics, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, and urology, and excluding application surgical hand tools and clamps for surgical implant systems particularly involving the spine; said electrosurgical instruments being distributed to medical doctors and hospitals through scrutinized purchasing procedures conducted by medical doctors and medical specialty item distributors, and manufactured, distributed, and sold through trade channels associated within the medical implant manufacturing and medical device manufacturing industry to medical doctors and hospitals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |