Drawing for NUEVA VERSION INTERNACIONAL

USPTO serial 76432965

NUEVA VERSION INTERNACIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUEVA VERSION INTERNACIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth E. Liu

ROBERT DINOLFO INTERNATIONAL BIBLE SOCIETY1820 JET STREAM DRCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80921UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing seminars, courses, classes, forums, workshops, conferences, symposia, lectures, retreats, and instruction in the fields of the Bible, Christianity, religion, theology, and spirituality, and distributing educational material in connection therewith; television programming and radio programming in the fields of Bible, Christianity, religion, theology, and spirituality; multimedia programming in the fields of Bible, Christianity, religion, theology, and spirituality provided via a global communications network; production and distribution of motion pictures in the fields of the Bible, Christianity, religion, theology, and spirituality; providing online interactive computer games; providing an interactive online computer database featuring Bible texts, Bible study resources, Biblical text searching, and Bible translation comparison chartsACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 28, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Jun 28, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Jun 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 2, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 14, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Jan 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 18, 2004TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITIONโ€”
Nov 18, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 18, 2004PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVEDโ€”
Oct 20, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2004LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUESTโ€”
Aug 24, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Jun 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Mar 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Sep 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Sep 15, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILEDโ€”
Jul 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance