USPTO serial 76433571
LABWEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LABWEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James V. Costigan
James V. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Uniforms; clothing, namely, suits made of leather; shirts; blouses; skirts; tailleurs; jackets; trousers; shorts; sport jerseys; T-shirts; pajamas; stockings; singlets; corsets; suspenders; pants; underwear; hats; scarves; headscarves; neckties; rainwear; overcoats; topcoats; swimsuits; tracksuits; wind resistant jackets; ski pants; belts; fur overcoats; shoewear, namely, slippers, shoes, sports shoes, boots and sandals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |