USPTO serial 76433774
HANDY MAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HANDY MAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest I. Gifford
ERNEST I GIFFORD GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSONPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Portable, foldable magnetic mat for holding metal hand tools and metal hardware, containing an integral strap for attaching to the tops of ladders, or can be used in flat position | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Devine, Rita M.
- Other trademarks owned by Devine, Rita M.
- Other trademarks owned by Devine Enterprises International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HANDY MAT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |