USPTO serial 76434394
PURE CLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURE CLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Becker
ROBERT W BECKER ROBERT W BECKER & ASSOCIATES707 HWY 66 E STE BTIJERAS, NM 87059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Abrasive preparation for use for cleaning, removing stains, polishing and smoothing surfaces, in institutional and residential use | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |