Drawing for ECLIPSE

USPTO serial 76435159

ECLIPSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECLIPSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George A. Smith, Jr.

GEORGE A SMITH JR HOWSON AND HOWSONSPRING HOUSE CORPORATE CTRBOX 457SPRING HOUSE, PA 19477

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011miniature, battery-powered, L E D flashlightsACTIVEDec 13, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 17, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 27, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 29, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 6, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance