USPTO serial 76435341
GALVANIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3042176Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GALVANIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
Charlottesville, VA, US
Charlottesville, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy G. Pruett
Amy G. Pruett Williams Mullen, c/o IP Docketing200 South 10th Street, Suite 1600Williams Mullen CenterRichmond, VA 23219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | musical sound and video recordings and series of musical sound and video recordings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 23, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |