Drawing for POKAFASE

USPTO serial 76435830

POKAFASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with POKAFASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016greeting cards and stickersACTIVEDec 31, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 23, 2007WDLLRESPONSE TO WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY PROCESSED—
Jan 23, 2007WDLAWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY APPROVED—
Jan 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 28, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 31, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2002CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance