Drawing for DIGITAL DISH

USPTO serial 76436001

DIGITAL DISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL DISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John F. McNulty

JOHN F MCNULTY PAUL & PAUL2900 TWO THOUSAND MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telephone equipment, namely, dishes for receiving electronic signals at the location of a user and providing the signals to a signal receiver at the location of a userACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 6, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 5, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 9, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 26, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 26, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 24, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance