USPTO serial 76436037
GLOBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2007
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GLOBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, CA
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, CA
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | (Based on Use in Commerce) DECORATIVE LIGHTING FIXTURES, NAMELY, ELECTRIC ROPE LIGHTING AND ELECTRIC ROPE LIGHTING MOTIFS IN THE NATURE OF ROPE LIGHTING WITH A REPEATED DESIGN OR COLOR; SODIUM AND MERCURY ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES, EXCLUDING SPHERICAL AND GLOBE SHAPED BULBS OR GLASS COVERINGS; PLUG-IN OUTDOOR DECK LIGHTING FIXTURES EXCLUDING SPHERICAL AND GLOBE SHAPED BULBS OR GLASS COVERINGS; (Based on 44(e)) ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES EXCLUDING SPHERICAL AND GLOBE SHAPED BULBS OR GLASS COVERINGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |