USPTO serial 76436070
ROCKEFELLER CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROCKEFELLER CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent N. Palladino
Vincent N. Palladino Fish & Neave IP Group, Ropes & Gray LLP1211 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-8704UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rockefeller Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rockefeller Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ROCKEFELLER CENTER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |