USPTO serial 76436149
ECOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Cruse, Jr.
JOSEPH R CRUSE JR301 E OCEAN BLVD STE 1760LONG BEACH, CA 90802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer Software, namely software which supports the manual entry of data into a designated form which can be transmitted and/or stored on computer based media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |