USPTO serial 76436312
MYSTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYSTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD T WHITE
STEVEN PLOTKIN THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0879UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films featuring action, adventure and animation, and motion picture films for broadcast on television featuring action, adventure and animations; digital versatile discs featuring action, adventure and animations; cd rom games; game equipment sold as a unit for playing computer game-video and computer game programs, namely, video game player; video game cartridges and cassettes, encoded magnetic cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys and games namely, action figures and accessories, game equipment sold as a unit for playing an action type target game, and stand alone video output game machines; action skill games; equipment sold as a unit for playing hand-held electronic games; electronic toys, namely electronic action toys, mechanical action toys; cases for action figures; hand held unit for playing electronic games; arcade games; toy action figures and accessories therefor, toy figures; card games; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; board games; equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; collectible toy figures; electronic toys, namely, electronic action toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live-action and animated television programs; production of live-action and animated television programs; entertainment services in the nature of live-action and animated motion picture theatrical films; production of live-action and animated motion picture theatrical films; theatrical performance both animated and live-action; computer services, namely, providing information in the field of entertainment relating to movies and television via an electronic global computer network; entertainment services in the field of interactive multi-player games namely, providing computer game programs via online electronic communications and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |