USPTO serial 76436342
COWBOY CIGARETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COWBOY CIGARETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIMBERLY LAVAS
MARK GOLDBERG COWBOY CIGARETTE158 9TH STREETBROOKLYN, NY 11215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | CIGARETTES, NAMELY CIGARETTES SOLD IN PACKS | ABANDONED | Jun 19, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2011 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |