Drawing for ROLLING THUNDER

USPTO serial 76436374

ROLLING THUNDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROLLING THUNDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard R. Muccino

RICHARD R MUCCINO758 SPRINGFIELD AVESUMMIT, NJ 07901UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely conducting seminars, classes and workshops in the field of veteran's affairsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2004ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
May 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance