USPTO serial 76436379
TELBOTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TELBOTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY PERVANAS
JEFFREY PERVANAS RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLPSTE 1800 2 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video conferencing apparatus consisting of a video monitor, microphones, video cameras and computer software to facilitate video conferencing; computer hardware and software in the field of telecommunications for facilitating video conferencing; video conferencing equipment, namely, video monitors, microphones, video cameras and computer hardware and software to facilitate video conferencing, robots for facilitating video conferencing, position detection equipment to detect the position of conferees in a room; teleconferencing equipment, namely, video monitors, microphones, video cameras and computer hardware and software to facilitate video conferencing, robots for facilitating video conferencing, position detection equipment to detect the position of conferees in a room; voice response equipment, namely, position detector for detecting the position of a conferee, and, computer hardware and software to track the conferee; motion detector software for facilitating video conferencing; robots for facilitating video conferencing; video conferencing system, namely, computer hardware and software to facilitate video conferencing, video cameras, audio speakers, video monitors, and input/output devices to control the video camera, audio speakers and video monitors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |