Drawing for TSAS

USPTO serial 76436382

TSAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TSAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles H. Harris

CHARLES H HARRIS OFFICE OF COUNSEL, ATTN (CODE 00L)NAVAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CTR503 ROBERT GRANT AVESILVER SPRING, MD 20910-7500

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed instructional, educational materials and informational flyers concerning a governmental defense program; Journals for medical and scientific researchACTIVE—
021household containers, namely drinking glasses and mugs and earthenware mugsACTIVE—
025clothing, namely caps, shirts, Polo shirts, sweat pants, T-shirtsACTIVE—
026embroidered emblems and cloth patches for clothingACTIVE—
038electronic transmission of technical data and information to a person via computer from personal and on-board detection equipment, namely, transmission of tactile sensory input to a garment worn by pilots, operators of spacecraft, operators of heavy equipment and sea-going vessels and visually impaired persons to determine their spatial orientation and for them to determine an approaching foreign object's distance and bearingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 9, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance