USPTO serial 76436463
TGM THE GREEN MACHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TGM THE GREEN MACHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody H. Drake
JODY H DRAKE SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VENDING MACHINES, AUTOMATIC VENDING MACHINES AND MECHANISMS FOR COIN OPERATED APPARATUS AND PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | MEAT, FISH, SEAFOOD, POULTRY AND GAME; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, JELLIES AND JAMS, MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS; POTATO AND FRUIT PRODUCTS; POTATO CRISPS; POTATO CHIPS; POTATO PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF SNACK FOODS, PREPARED MEALS; NUTS AND MIXTURES OF NUTS AND DRIED FRUITS; DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; CHEESE IN GENERAL; CHEESE SPREADS, CHEESE DIPS; YOGURT; PICKLES; SNACK BARS IN THE FORM OF FRUIT AND CEREAL BARS; SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, ORGANIC CRISPS AND BAKED CRISPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | PREPARED MEALS, SNACK FOODS AND PREPARATIONS CONSISTING PRINCIPALLY OF NOODLES, RICE, SPAGHETTI OR PASTA, SAUCES AND KETCHUP; DESSERTS; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING DESSERTS; POPPED POPCORN; GRAIN AND COFFEE BEVERAGES; CHOCOLATE PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF CHOCOLATE BARS AND CHOCOLATE DRINKS; CONFECTIONERY IN THE FORM OF LICORICE AND BOILED SWEETS; BREAKFAST CEREALS; PASTA; BISCUITS, PASTRIES, CAKES, ICE CREAM; SALAD DRESSINGS; MOUSSES; PUDDINGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Organic & Natural Food Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TGM THE GREEN MACHINE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |