USPTO serial 76436618
TAKE TIME OFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAKE TIME OFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly G. Russell
KIMBERLY G RUSSELL BARE ESCENTUALS INC22ND FL71 STEVENSON STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic skin cream; lotions and gels, namely, facial lotion, shower gel, hair gel, age-retardant gel, and eye gel; essential oils used as cosmetics, namely, essential oils for personal use; facial masks, namely, anti-aging masks; and cosmetic powders for the skin, namely, dusting powders and facial powders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |