USPTO serial 76437109
ECOMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan M. Meschkow
JORDAN M MESCHKOW MESCHKOW & GRESHAM PLC5727 N 7TH ST STE 409PHOENIX, AZ 85014-5818UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Water-based multi-purpose cleaners | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARLTON-CAREW, OLABISI
- Other trademarks owned by SOQ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SOQ ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ECOMATE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2005 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |