USPTO serial 76437230
NSI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NSI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan S. Weinstein
JORDAN S WEINSTEIN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAN, MAIER & NEUST1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3454UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING PUBLIC AWARENESS OF THE NEED FOR NUTRITION SCREENING | ACTIVE | Jun 17, 2002 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES,NAMELY,ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS FOR HEALTH CARE PROCESSIONAL, ADMINISTRATORS, POLICY MAKERS AND THE PUBLIC CONCERNING NUTRITION SCREENING | ACTIVE | Jun 17, 2002 |
| 042 | PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF NUTRITION SCREENING THROUGH BROCHURES AND INFORMATIONAL BULLETINS TO HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS, ADMINISTRATORS, POLICY MAKERS AND THE PUBLIC | ACTIVE | Jun 17, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by the American Academy of Family Physicians
- Other trademarks owned by The American Dietetic Association
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NSI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |